Thelema’s First True Schism?

Has the Foundation of Our Aeon changed?

It has come to the attention of many that some have decided that it is their right and privilege to change the text of Liber AL vel Legis to fit their presuppositions. Here is a response from Paul Rovelli, and the Gnostic Church of L.V.X.

“We regret to inform you that the Caliphate has now published Liber AL vel Legis with a word changed; fulfilling their position in the fill/kill controversy. The Black Brothers have once again, turned the symbols upside down and, in this case, Thelema is seriously diminished.”

Aleister Crowley, the founder of Thelemic Philosophy and Magick made it clear in his revelations written in Liber Al vel Legis that the texts were not to be changed.

Al:3:47. “This book shall be translated into all tongues: but always with the original in the writing of the Beast; for in the chance shape of the letters and their position to one another: in these are mysteries that no Beast shall divine.”

A Cabalist and master of numerical code, Crowley had good reason preserve the possibility of new and fresh knowledge from this book.

Let’s hope the schism within the Caliphate becomes huge and that there really are “direful judgments of Ra-Hoor-Khuit.” And we need a lot of people to start publishing Liber AL, as it is in the public domain…Weiser press has to see a lot of competition in order for them to stop publishing the book. And then that version will be killed…lol…pun intended.
Go to Create Space, Lulu and any other print on demand service and put up an “Aiwass Authorized” copy of Liber AL and hit Weiser where it hurts…and for matter, boycott Weiser…order copies of the wrong Liber AL and return it…go into your local book store and draw an ‘f’ in the copy, so that others will return the book also…don’t let Weiser or the Caliphate make any money on this. Write letters to Weiser and spread the word…our voice has to become louder than there’s.

 

From the diary of one of AC’s Scarlet Women, who was taught by the Master himself:

From diary of Alostrael:

Invocation of RA-HOOR-KHUIT

“O Thou God of War and of Vengence, Hear me, Alostrael, etc., (insert your name) who invokes Thee to help us to do Thy Work.

Be Thou our strength, our force, and vigor of our arms, as Unit is our refuge, and Hadit our Light, that we may go on, go on, in Thy strength, and fight as brothers.

Hear me, Thou Lord of the Double Wand of Power. Unto Thee do I eat this cake of light, that it may breed lust and power of lust in me.

Hear Thou me, 0 Lord of Silence and of Strength. Show me Thy way that I may follow Thee in it.

Give Thou of Thy Wisdom to Our Lord, The Beast 666, whom Nuit has called her Scribe, Ankh-af-na-khonsu, the Priest of Princes; whom Hadit Hails at the Prophet of Nu, the Prophet of Had, the Prophet of Ra-Hoor-Khu; and whom Thou hast termed 0 Blessed Beast, that He may comment with his Three-fold Book of Law with Hadit burning in his heart.

Thee, in whose name is hidden and glorious, a splendor I Invoke, I greet Thy presence, O Ra-Hoor-Khuit.

Unity uttermost showed! I adore the might of Thy breath. Supreme and terrible God That maketh the Gods and death To tremble before Thee: —I adore Thee.

Appear on the throne of Ra! Open the ways of the Khu! Lighten the ways of the Ka The ways of the Khabs run through To stir me or to still me! Aum! Let it fill me!”

 

Here a link for more information about this ongoing issue:

http://www.gclvx.org/thelema%27s-first-true-schism.htm

Download the “Aiwass Authorized” copy of Liber AL in PDF form (Free OF COURSE)

More updates will be forthcoming…

Comments

  1. I don’t know what you all think about this, but I don’t think the OTO had any right to change this, and now they’re publishing this “NEW” version of Thelema’s most holy book. Future generations will be none the wiser. This is EXACTLY what Crowley was trying to protect Thelema against.

  2. I don’t know what you all think about this, but I don’t think the OTO had any right to change this, and now they’re publishing this “NEW” version of Thelema’s most holy book. Future generations will be none the wiser. This is EXACTLY what Crowley was trying to protect Thelema against.

  3. I don’t know what you all think about this, but I don’t think the OTO had any right to change this, and now they’re publishing this “NEW” version of Thelema’s most holy book. Future generations will be none the wiser. This is EXACTLY what Crowley was trying to protect Thelema against.

  4. Those scans prove nothing. In all the proofreading that AC did before publication, he never once corrected fill to kill? If anything, those links prove that AC agreed the text should read “fill.”

  5. A friend showed me this link today, Phillip English, maybe you would like to read it. You seem to want to defend the decision to alter Liber AL, but yet make no defense other than pointing to the OFFICIAL DEFENSE and a failed appeal to ridicule my statement with false quotation. Does this remind anyone of anything? There are too many instances in the history of man, of the blind leading the blind. And in my opinion, Thelemites these are not. I’m through discussing the matter, at least with you. If anyone else would like to compare thoughts or even debate, let’s take it to a different venue. 93

    http://www.gclvx.org/thelema's-first-true-schism.htm

  6. Paul- It was not my intent to ridicule you and it appears that you are making a very big straw man argument. Your original link seems to be a particularly biased piece of oversimplification of the decision. I do not aim to persuade you, but just wanted to ask if you’d actually given much thought to what lead to the change in the first place.

  7. as a completely unbiased outsider, the handwritten text clearly says “fill.” when you have second thoughts after a vision they are your own nonsense, assuming the vision isn’t your own nonsense in the first place, and you certainly won’t be confusing an audible f sound for an audible k sound. the visual and the auditory are both just too far from each other for a later interpolation to be anything but vanity of the scribe.

    also, you all read like twits arguing over a barbecue when you should just barbecue your own meats. also my brain keeps wanting to frame this debate as an amusing prophetic allusion to the dwarven brothers fili and kili in the hobbit. no reason.

  8. I dont have too many sympathies with Rovelli. But apart from that I agree with him. I come down on the “fill me” side of things.

    Really the change to “kill” being in a book has been a long time coming from them, and from a ritual standpoint if you where them and took an official stance youd want one with your choice in it as well.

    I probably wont personally ever be joining the OTO, this being one of the reasons.

Comments are closed